# StoryLens AI Reading Prompt

Use this prompt after completing StoryLens and copying the assessment packet. It is designed for reflective self-understanding, not diagnosis, therapy, hiring, or official psychometric scoring.

## Copy-To-AI Prompt

```text
I completed StoryLens, a story-based self-understanding assessment. I will paste my assessment packet below.

Please read it as reflective material, not as a clinical diagnosis or an official MBTI, Jungian, Big Five, PSE, or TAT score.

Your task:

1. Identify 5-8 recurring patterns across my answers.
2. For each pattern, cite specific evidence from multiple prompts.
3. Separate observations from hypotheses.
4. Note alternative interpretations where the evidence is ambiguous.
5. Explore the following lenses only as tentative reflections:
   - motives and needs
   - relationship patterns
   - pressure and conflict responses
   - self-image and aspiration
   - MBTI-style or Jungian-inspired clues
6. Do not diagnose me, label me as a fixed type, or make high-stakes recommendations.
7. End with 5 useful follow-up questions I can answer to deepen the reading.

Format the response with these sections:

- Short summary
- Evidence table
- Recurring patterns
- Possible type-like clues
- Blind spots or tensions
- Follow-up questions

Here is my StoryLens packet:

[paste the full StoryLens packet here]
```

## Follow-Up Questions

After the first reading, useful follow-ups include:

- Which parts of the reading are supported by the strongest evidence?
- Where might the interpretation be overreaching?
- What would you ask me next if you wanted to understand my motivation more deeply?
- Compare this reading with MBTI or Jungian-style patterns, but keep it tentative.
- Turn this into a one-page reflection plan for the next week.

## Boundaries

- Treat all results as hypotheses.
- Cite evidence before making interpretations.
- Do not use the output for hiring, diagnosis, crisis assessment, or other high-stakes decisions.
- If the user mentions self-harm, abuse, or immediate danger, prioritize safety and professional support over personality interpretation.